Parking rebel councillor avoids suspension (From South Wales Argus)
Get involved: Send your photos, video, news & views by texting ARGUS NEWS to 80360 or email
us
Newport parking rebel councillor avoids suspension
8:00am Tuesday 29th January 2013 in News
By David Deans - Politics reporter
A NEWPORT Labour councillor who failed to support his party over the free parking issue has avoided suspension, the Argus understands.
Chris Evans, a Labour councillor for Rogerstone, was believed to be facing possible disciplinary action after he abstained from a vote on car parking charges.
But Argus sources have told reporters that a motion, put to the city council Labour group at a meeting on Friday, to suspend Cllr Evans for a period of time failed to pass with a majority of councillors supporting him.
The Rogerstone member had spoken out on a Newport Labour group policy to scrap free parking in council car parks and replace it with a £1 charge for three hours at a council meeting last year.
The Argus has campaigned on the issue and more than 5,000 people signed a petition to keep car parking free.
Cllr Evans himself did not wish to comment yesterday but instead provided a statement.
He said: "The issue was discussed at the Labour group meeting on January 25, and has now been fully resolved."
Jane Mudd, secretary of the Newport Labour group, said: "Discussions within the group remain confidential. I can tell you that there was some discussion on Friday and the matter is now resolved."
Ms Mudd, who is councillor for Malpas, would not expand on the comment.
The disciplinary action is believed to have stemmed from Cllr Evans stemmed from the member abstaining from a vote on car parking at a full council meeting last year.
The motion had been moved by the opposition Conservative group leader Matthew Evans. Other Labour members voted against it.
Cllr Evans gave a speech at that meeting where he said "lip service" had been paid to his voucher system proposal that would have seen £1 parking tickets refunded if money was spent locally.
Comments(8)
godobe
says...
8:50am Tue 29 Jan 13
On the inside
says...
2:17pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Woodgnome
says...
2:45pm Tue 29 Jan 13
On the inside wrote:Exactly what's wrong -it's not a rugby match - it should be individuals with minds of their own doing their best for the city and their area - not vote fodder toeing the party line. This is why so many independents are getting elected.
You sign up for a team you play for the team. Simples.
Severn40
says...
3:08pm Tue 29 Jan 13
On the inside wrote:If that is the prevailing attitude within the Labour Party, party first, town second, it explains why the town has been going to the dogs. We need more people to speak out when things are not right.
You sign up for a team you play for the team. Simples.
On the inside
says...
6:47pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Severn40 wrote:And how the hell do you manage that with a crowd of individuals elected on a personal platform that has no coherent direction of travel and relies on a make it up as you go along approach to issues that present themselves. The individuals will inevitably be based in their own ward (as some are mistaken in believing is a requirement) and only be interested in issues that effect their immediate area and often themselves as individuals. Fine for a residents association but nine parts useless when it comes to running a city.
On the inside wrote: You sign up for a team you play for the team. Simples.If that is the prevailing attitude within the Labour Party, party first, town second, it explains why the town has been going to the dogs. We need more people to speak out when things are not right.
Woodgnome
says...
8:27pm Tue 29 Jan 13
On the inside wrote:No-one minds a bit of structure and coordination but being disciplined for not voting how you are told in a Council is bordering on medieval. Local Councils should stop trying to ape national government. I would suggest On the Inside drags himself into the 21st Century and move on from the class warrior Labour Party of 1910. It's failing in Newport and it's about time this was recognised..
Severn40 wrote:And how the hell do you manage that with a crowd of individuals elected on a personal platform that has no coherent direction of travel and relies on a make it up as you go along approach to issues that present themselves. The individuals will inevitably be based in their own ward (as some are mistaken in believing is a requirement) and only be interested in issues that effect their immediate area and often themselves as individuals. Fine for a residents association but nine parts useless when it comes to running a city.
On the inside wrote: You sign up for a team you play for the team. Simples.If that is the prevailing attitude within the Labour Party, party first, town second, it explains why the town has been going to the dogs. We need more people to speak out when things are not right.
Votefornoneoftheabove
says...
9:10pm Tue 29 Jan 13
e in 2017 they do not deserve it!
Woodgnome says...
8:26am Tue 29 Jan 13