Blackwood man who had 1,500 child sex pictures spared jail

A BLACKWOOD man was spared jail after being found with almost 1,500 indecent pictures of children.

Police raided the home of Adam Gibbons, 20, on August 9 last year after receiving information he was downloading indecent images of children.

When his house was searched, police found images on a USB stick, external hard drive, laptop and computer.

Newport Crown Court heard police found 1,499 indecent images of youngsters as young as ten; 931 were level one, 91 were level two, 299 were level three, 144 were level four and 34 were of the most severe category, level five.

Gibbons, of Canberra Close, Blackwood, admitted to police that he had downloaded the pictures for his own gratification over the past two years.

He pleaded guilty to 15 counts of making indecent images of children and one count of possession of indecent images of children.

Defending, Andrew Jones, said Gibbons gave a remarkably frank interview to police and said his pre-sentence report noted he had feelings of disgust in himself over what he had done, as well as losing his partner and his job.

The court heard that, following his appearance in magistrates’ court, vandals daubed the words 'paedo scum' on his family home.

Record Jeremy Jenkins said: "No-one, reading a synopsis of these images, could feel anything but utter revulsion, you are looking at abuse of children in the most vile way."

Gibbons was given a three-year community order for each offence, to be served concurrently, and told to attend the internet sexual offender’s programme. He was also disqualified from working with children for five years, ordered to sign on the sex offenders' register and given a sexual offences prevention order for the same period of time.

Recorder Jenkins said he was not imposing a prison sentence because the maximum length he could give, two years, would not be enough time for any treatment programmes to be successful.

His computer equipment will be forfeited and destroyed.

Comments(7)

Lucha Libre says...
12:52pm Sat 2 Feb 13

Two nonces in a week spared jail sentences? Why? The illuminati reaches far and wide.

Concerned parent expat says...
3:49pm Sat 2 Feb 13

I'm assuming the Argus has the facts right about this case. The criminal is clearly a sick dangerous individual.Sentencin
g is a total joke. Who is standing up for and protecting our children from people like this.
Can someone explain why they couldn't sentence him for 2 years or more ? If the recorder thinks the criminal couldn't get successful treatment within a 2 year jail sentence then who is campaigning for longer sentences to enable this to happen. Besides wouldn't putting this man in jail serve some purpose in deterring others and protecting children from this man. I am also shocked by the lack of public comments, is this apathy? I am shocked. If we do nothing , then nothing will improve and things will worsen. I will be writing to my MP. Readers... What can you do to improve the way we protect the young and vulnerable ?

MR DUDLEY says...
12:26am Sun 3 Feb 13

I believe I could tell The Recorder what treatment this person should get and it's not pleasent .

The_Vulcan says...
11:46am Sun 3 Feb 13

This man is 20. He has years of offending ahead of him. 10years in the slammer may of done the trick.

Jujtsu1 says...
4:10pm Sun 3 Feb 13

How the hell can somebody be let off with these charges. I presonnally think the courts have gone soft. At the end of the day the children in the images have been abused somewhere along the lines. So the more pedos locked up the less harm to our children. better still bring back Capitol Punishment.

Mike Bates says...
6:08pm Sun 3 Feb 13

Bloody ridiculous. Somebody fiddles there tax and goes to jail. Somebody messes with kids and is allowed to walk free. What a screwed up view of the world the judges must have.

Peterday says...
10:24pm Sun 3 Feb 13

If Adam Gibbons had downloaded images or children being tortured that would not have been against the law, as the image is not the crime.
The law would concede that Adam was not complicit in the torture depicted in the image. Many people have video collections that include depictions of crimes, including murder, but it is not illegal to possess such images. Adam has not assaulted any child, he has looked at images and has been convicted for what he might have been thinking. (Thoughtcrime)

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree