THE NEWSDESK: More AMs – it’s top of voters’ wish list, right?

SENEDD: We don’t need to fill the place up with more Assembly members, do we? SENEDD: We don’t need to fill the place up with more Assembly members, do we?

IS ANYONE still surprised by the public’s inability to turn out for elections or give a damn about what politicians say?

If they are, take a look at some of the online comments about last week’s idea – that we should increase the number of Assembly Members from 60 to 80.

Presiding officer Rosemary Butler made the call in her submission to the Silk Commission examining whether further powers should be devolved to Wales.

The Newport West AM said an increase in AMs would be part of a “strong and clear constitutional settlement for the assembly and the people of Wales”.

And she added: “Given the weight of responsibility resting with the institution, and the unavoidable scale of the workload faced by members, I am in no doubt that the number of Assembly Members should be increased from 60 to 80.”

Now I know that Mrs Butler does excellent work in her constituency and as presiding officer, but statements like these will do nothing to endear her to the electorate.

Because, to quote The Smiths: “It says nothing to me about my life.”

Process, process, process – why are politicians so seemingly enamoured of their process?

One can argue all one likes about slashing the number of Lords or MPs to pay for it, or the benefits of a greater number of eyes on other public spending: people on the street just see more jobs for the self-appointed elite while the rest of us are struggling.

If there is a case for an expanded Assembly, there surely is no worse time to make it.

I see little public appetite for anything which does not directly address what we care about – jobs, paying our bills, caring for our pensioners, making sure our NHS is fit for purpose.

Politicians – if you want us to turn out and vote for you, start talking to us about the things which matter to us.

● The decision on what it puts in a new Government of Wales Bill which would be needed for any substantial changes to the assembly’s powers or structure, including new members, will be made by the UK government.

It is expected to release its submission to the Silk Commission this week.

Give trip few hours and they’ll be bickering

WANTED: a man and a woman – possibly a married couple – for a 501-day journey to Mars and back which would start in less than five years.

The privately-financed mission, expected to cost upwards of $1billion, is the brainchild of Mars Foundation founder Dennis Tito, a multimillionaire who in 2001 paid $20million for a trip to the International Space Station.

He said he will pay start-up costs for two years to begin development of life-support systems and other technology.

The aim is to take advantage of a rare planetary alignment that would allow a craft to loop around Mars, coming as close as about 150 miles to the planet’s surface, before returning to Earth.

The launch window for the mission opens on January 5, 2018.

The next opportunity is not until 2031. The spacecraft will have about 600 cubic feet of living space available for a twoperson crew. The craft would recycle air, water, urine and perspiration.

Much of the time would be taken up with maintenance and science experiments.

Once the spaceship is on its way, there is no turning back.

“If something goes wrong, they’re not coming back,” one organiser said.

Mission planners say they would like to fly a man and a woman, preferably a married couple who would be compatible during a long period of isolation.

Insert your own laughter here.

Someone who has never cohabited with a member of the opposite sex must have come up with that one.

“Houston, we have a problem...

the toilet seat is up AGAIN...”

I think that as men are supposedly from Mars and women from Venus, mission control would be better off looking for blokes in the first blush of a bromance.

Comments(10)

Mervyn James says...
8:10pm Mon 4 Mar 13

With the soon to be name change from 'Assembly' to 'Government' this seems an logical progression. There are 600+ in London, so I don't see 80 in Wales as excessive. This can be offset by ridding ourselves of the 'double up' representation we have, when we govern ourselves we won't need MP's, so in reality a huge saving on jaunts/freebies/expe
nses/housing to London every week to live la dolce vita and more answerable to us here.

Can't please some people..... this will save money in the long run, we have to set up ourselves as a viable government, not an poor relative of the London affluent. Pulling our strings from down the M4....

Llanmartinangel says...
10:10pm Mon 4 Mar 13

Mervyn James wrote:
With the soon to be name change from 'Assembly' to 'Government' this seems an logical progression. There are 600+ in London, so I don't see 80 in Wales as excessive. This can be offset by ridding ourselves of the 'double up' representation we have, when we govern ourselves we won't need MP's, so in reality a huge saving on jaunts/freebies/expe

nses/housing to London every week to live la dolce vita and more answerable to us here.

Can't please some people..... this will save money in the long run, we have to set up ourselves as a viable government, not an poor relative of the London affluent. Pulling our strings from down the M4....
How do you figure that out? One AM per 34000 people? The UK parliament has only ever had one MP per 100000 population, even before devolution. And they had/have everything to administer, including defence, foreign policy, treasury, crime and justice etc. Why do you think the answer to everything is to squander taxpayers hard earned cash on it? It won't just be 20 more AMs either. They will have secretaries and all the other pointless free-loading hangers-on to help them breathe.

Mervyn James says...
8:29am Tue 5 Mar 13

More work for us all, can't be a bad thing :) we will also have a lot less spent on MP's so a decent trade off, not an extra expense. We no longer relate to Westminster, there is an urgent need for Wales to connect with its own assembly, and for the in-fighting to stop. Westminster has written us off, if we don't do for ourselves no-one else will. I doubt there will be many freebies they can use at Cardiff !

Llanmartinangel says...
9:25am Tue 5 Mar 13

Hmmm. Until you remember that each government employee uses the tax take from one wealth producing worker for their salary and benefits. Who will pay that? Especially given that nearly half the population of Wales pays no tax at all. Only a tiny number pay the 49% rate. So unless you go 'cap in hand' to Westminister the vast majority of your countrymen will need to manage without benefits and with an even worse health service than it has now. You can't eat patriotism. And Wales can't make money.

Owain Vaughan says...
10:42am Tue 5 Mar 13

It's quite amusing that Mervyn uses the pronoun "we" for his delusional separatist rantings. Who is this "we" of which you speak?

Llanmartinangel says...
11:55am Tue 5 Mar 13

Llanmartinangel wrote:
Hmmm. Until you remember that each government employee uses the tax take from one wealth producing worker for their salary and benefits. Who will pay that? Especially given that nearly half the population of Wales pays no tax at all. Only a tiny number pay the 49% rate. So unless you go 'cap in hand' to Westminister the vast majority of your countrymen will need to manage without benefits and with an even worse health service than it has now. You can't eat patriotism. And Wales can't make money.
That should read, 'the income tax take of ten wealth producing worker'.

In other words, they are very expensive people. We should only have them where we need them.

On the inside says...
12:03pm Tue 5 Mar 13

I see the Argus is now determinedly populist instead of critical in the true sense of balance. I suppose it will take up the cudgel for the populist issue of racism now?

KarmaSuitsYa says...
1:04pm Tue 5 Mar 13

On the inside wrote:
I see the Argus is now determinedly populist instead of critical in the true sense of balance. I suppose it will take up the cudgel for the populist issue of racism now?
Was far more balanced an assessment than I would make.

Severn40 says...
1:48pm Tue 5 Mar 13

Any increase in AMs must be linked to a reduction of representatives elsewhere such as MPs and councillors. I don't think the Welsh public will tolerate an increase in politician numbers at present.

My biggest concern, however, is that we have a Welsh Government that has consistently over the years to raise their game. They act as a glorified county council. Compare that to the Scottish Government and Parliament and even the London Assembly.

Llanmartinangel says...
4:19pm Tue 5 Mar 13

On the inside wrote:
I see the Argus is now determinedly populist instead of critical in the true sense of balance. I suppose it will take up the cudgel for the populist issue of racism now?
You could try putting a reasoned arguement of your own instead of reciting Labour Party sound-bite claptrap.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree