THE NEWSDESK: More AMs – it’s top of voters’ wish list, right? (From South Wales Argus)
Get involved: Send your photos, video, news & views by texting ARGUS NEWS to 80360 or email
us
THE NEWSDESK: More AMs – it’s top of voters’ wish list, right?
4:10pm Monday 4th March 2013 in News
SENEDD: We don’t need to fill the place up with more Assembly members, do we?
IS ANYONE still surprised by the public’s inability to turn out for elections or give a damn about what politicians say?
If they are, take a look at some of the online comments about last week’s idea – that we should increase the number of Assembly Members from 60 to 80.
Presiding officer Rosemary Butler made the call in her submission to the Silk Commission examining whether further powers should be devolved to Wales.
The Newport West AM said an increase in AMs would be part of a “strong and clear constitutional settlement for the assembly and the people of Wales”.
And she added: “Given the weight of responsibility resting with the institution, and the unavoidable scale of the workload faced by members, I am in no doubt that the number of Assembly Members should be increased from 60 to 80.”
Now I know that Mrs Butler does excellent work in her constituency and as presiding officer, but statements like these will do nothing to endear her to the electorate.
Because, to quote The Smiths: “It says nothing to me about my life.”
Process, process, process – why are politicians so seemingly enamoured of their process?
One can argue all one likes about slashing the number of Lords or MPs to pay for it, or the benefits of a greater number of eyes on other public spending: people on the street just see more jobs for the self-appointed elite while the rest of us are struggling.
If there is a case for an expanded Assembly, there surely is no worse time to make it.
I see little public appetite for anything which does not directly address what we care about – jobs, paying our bills, caring for our pensioners, making sure our NHS is fit for purpose.
Politicians – if you want us to turn out and vote for you, start talking to us about the things which matter to us.
● The decision on what it puts in a new Government of Wales Bill which would be needed for any substantial changes to the assembly’s powers or structure, including new members, will be made by the UK government.
It is expected to release its submission to the Silk Commission this week.
Give trip few hours and they’ll be bickering
WANTED: a man and a woman – possibly a married couple – for a 501-day journey to Mars and back which would start in less than five years.
The privately-financed mission, expected to cost upwards of $1billion, is the brainchild of Mars Foundation founder Dennis Tito, a multimillionaire who in 2001 paid $20million for a trip to the International Space Station.
He said he will pay start-up costs for two years to begin development of life-support systems and other technology.
The aim is to take advantage of a rare planetary alignment that would allow a craft to loop around Mars, coming as close as about 150 miles to the planet’s surface, before returning to Earth.
The launch window for the mission opens on January 5, 2018.
The next opportunity is not until 2031. The spacecraft will have about 600 cubic feet of living space available for a twoperson crew. The craft would recycle air, water, urine and perspiration.
Much of the time would be taken up with maintenance and science experiments.
Once the spaceship is on its way, there is no turning back.
“If something goes wrong, they’re not coming back,” one organiser said.
Mission planners say they would like to fly a man and a woman, preferably a married couple who would be compatible during a long period of isolation.
Insert your own laughter here.
Someone who has never cohabited with a member of the opposite sex must have come up with that one.
“Houston, we have a problem...
the toilet seat is up AGAIN...”
I think that as men are supposedly from Mars and women from Venus, mission control would be better off looking for blokes in the first blush of a bromance.
Comments(10)
Llanmartinangel
says...
10:10pm Mon 4 Mar 13
Mervyn James wrote:How do you figure that out? One AM per 34000 people? The UK parliament has only ever had one MP per 100000 population, even before devolution. And they had/have everything to administer, including defence, foreign policy, treasury, crime and justice etc. Why do you think the answer to everything is to squander taxpayers hard earned cash on it? It won't just be 20 more AMs either. They will have secretaries and all the other pointless free-loading hangers-on to help them breathe.
With the soon to be name change from 'Assembly' to 'Government' this seems an logical progression. There are 600+ in London, so I don't see 80 in Wales as excessive. This can be offset by ridding ourselves of the 'double up' representation we have, when we govern ourselves we won't need MP's, so in reality a huge saving on jaunts/freebies/expe
nses/housing to London every week to live la dolce vita and more answerable to us here.
Can't please some people..... this will save money in the long run, we have to set up ourselves as a viable government, not an poor relative of the London affluent. Pulling our strings from down the M4....
Mervyn James
says...
8:29am Tue 5 Mar 13
Llanmartinangel
says...
9:25am Tue 5 Mar 13
Owain Vaughan
says...
10:42am Tue 5 Mar 13
Llanmartinangel
says...
11:55am Tue 5 Mar 13
Llanmartinangel wrote:That should read, 'the income tax take of ten wealth producing worker'.
Hmmm. Until you remember that each government employee uses the tax take from one wealth producing worker for their salary and benefits. Who will pay that? Especially given that nearly half the population of Wales pays no tax at all. Only a tiny number pay the 49% rate. So unless you go 'cap in hand' to Westminister the vast majority of your countrymen will need to manage without benefits and with an even worse health service than it has now. You can't eat patriotism. And Wales can't make money.
In other words, they are very expensive people. We should only have them where we need them.
On the inside
says...
12:03pm Tue 5 Mar 13
KarmaSuitsYa
says...
1:04pm Tue 5 Mar 13
On the inside wrote:Was far more balanced an assessment than I would make.
I see the Argus is now determinedly populist instead of critical in the true sense of balance. I suppose it will take up the cudgel for the populist issue of racism now?
Severn40
says...
1:48pm Tue 5 Mar 13
My biggest concern, however, is that we have a Welsh Government that has consistently over the years to raise their game. They act as a glorified county council. Compare that to the Scottish Government and Parliament and even the London Assembly.
Llanmartinangel
says...
4:19pm Tue 5 Mar 13
On the inside wrote:You could try putting a reasoned arguement of your own instead of reciting Labour Party sound-bite claptrap.
I see the Argus is now determinedly populist instead of critical in the true sense of balance. I suppose it will take up the cudgel for the populist issue of racism now?
Mervyn James says...
8:10pm Mon 4 Mar 13
nses/housing to London every week to live la dolce vita and more answerable to us here.
Can't please some people..... this will save money in the long run, we have to set up ourselves as a viable government, not an poor relative of the London affluent. Pulling our strings from down the M4....