Caerphilly council to face police probe over pay row

Gwent Police say Caerphilly council should face probe Gwent Police say Caerphilly council should face probe

GWENT Police say Caerphilly council should face an investigation after the Wales Audit Office said the way pay rises were made for its top officers was unlawful.

The WAO on Wednesday blasted Caerphilly council for failures, inadequacies and acting unlawfully over the way pay rises of up to 20 per cent were made for senior officers, including chief executive Anthony O’Sullivan.

Gwent Police yesterday said the matter should be investigated to ensure transparency and independence, but has referred the controversy to Avon and Somerset Police, who say they are reviewing the issue.

It comes after the Welsh Government Local Government Minister Carl Sargeant yesterday demanded swift action from the council.

A spokeswoman for Gwent Police said the matter was referred in light of the force’s close proximity and working relationship with Caerphilly council.

Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they are reviewing the report, and a spokesman said the force will be liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service.

A spokesman for Caerphilly council said: “We have become aware of police involvement and we will cooperate fully with any investigation.”

Colin Mann, leader of the opposition Plaid Cymru group on Caerphilly council, said police involvement was inevitable.

He said: “There are thousands of dedicated and loyal employees at the council and it is vital that they are not tarnished by this episode.”

Meanwhile, Mr Sargeant yesterday told AMs he will be “contacting the leader of Caerphilly council today to ask him what action the council plans to take”.

He said: “I am seeking an assurance that the council will take swift action to deal with the recommendations in the report and that this situation will not be repeated...

I expect a prompt response.”

He said he was “very concerned”

that legal advice given within the council was deemed unlawful, and that it “is totally out of keeping with these principles for any such decisions to appear to be taken ‘behind closed doors’.”

The statement came after Jocelyn Davies, Plaid AM, was refused an urgent question in the Assembly on the matter by presiding officer Rosemary Butler. If one was allowed, AMs would have been able to debate the matter in the Senedd yesterday.

Ms Davies later managed to raise the issue in the chamber, but she told the Argus: “If the government are prepared to comment in this to the media, then why should democratically elected representatives be denied the opportunity to pursue this with the minister directly?”

An Assembly spokesman said: “The presiding officer determined that it was not a matter of urgent public importance.”

Auditor says the decision was unlawful

PAY rises for top Caerphilly council officers – including an extra £32,000 for chief executive Anthony O’Sullivan – caused an outcry among staff after they emerged in December.

The rises were awarded by a five-man committee and were based on a report written by the chief executive. Caerphilly council later reached a compromise, and Mr O’Sullivan’s pay rise was reduced to £5,000.

But Anthony Barrett, of the Wales Audit Office, found that the original decision was unlawful for a number of reasons.

They included the fact that officers who were likely to gain from the move, including Mr O’Sullivan, were sitting in on the meeting where the decision was made and did not leave.

Nor was the meeting advertised, with agendas not available for public inspection as they should have been.

The report recommended that in future all meetings are properly advertised, any conflicts of interest are looked into and procedures are clearly set out.

Awards ‘immoral and insensitive’ - union

PUBLIC sector union Unison has welcomed the findings of the Wales Audit Office report, saying the pay awards were “immoral, insensitive and unjustified”.

Dominic MacAskill, Unison Cymru head of local government, called for a review of all chief officers’ pay in the Welsh public sector.

He said: “We have called on Mr Sargeant to initiate this review so that a fair, objective and transparent process can be established for determining the pay and terms and conditions of this group of workers.”

Gary Enright, Unison Caerphilly branch secretary, said: “Unison has always argued that the decision to award such lucrative pay awards to the Caerphilly council’s chief executive officers was immoral, insensitive and unjustified.

“The workforce in Caerphilly has suffered a three-year pay freeze and many are struggling to make ends meet.

“The chief officers’ pay award has left a bitter taste in workers’ mouths and morale has been affected.

“The officers involved have an opportunity to stand alongside the workforce, do the right thing and to forgo any award given.”

Comments(14)

bloggsy1 says...
11:21am Thu 7 Mar 13

The Officers involved in this should resign, and the councellors who voted to give the rises should be prosecuted and sacked. No Question

bloggsy1 says...
11:21am Thu 7 Mar 13

The Officers involved in this should resign, and the councellors who voted to give the rises should be prosecuted and sacked. No Question

tazeez says...
1:36pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Yes, I agree with what has been said about this scandal.

How can Rosemary Butler say that this is not an urgent public issue?

This senior officers should be suspended pending the police investigation.

historyman66 says...
1:38pm Thu 7 Mar 13

We the public of Caerphilly County should wait until all investigations are complete, and reports published,then make our own judgements in a fair and balanced way.

jerymp says...
2:41pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Who are the people comprising the five man committee?

davidcp says...
4:26pm Thu 7 Mar 13

"Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they are reviewing the report, and a spokesman said the force will be liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service."
I read that to mean they are going to see if it IS a criminal, rather than procedural matter. The WAO didn't call for police action.

Woodgnome says...
7:46pm Thu 7 Mar 13

historyman66 wrote:
We the public of Caerphilly County should wait until all investigations are complete, and reports published,then make our own judgements in a fair and balanced way.
The auditors have said it was unlawful. How many investigations do you want? I'm afraid wishy washy tolerance is what gives these people the arrogance to play the system

KarmaSuitsYa says...
8:08pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Hang 'em high! Burn it down! And sic semper tyrannis!

These people don't care about us. They never have, and they never will. Just how much more proof do you need before enough is enough?

scraptheWAG says...
8:15pm Thu 7 Mar 13

how on earth can a council office in a poor low wage area like this pay these telephone salaries for doing a very basic job . No wonder under the labour years that the council tax doubled

isobel57 says...
9:04pm Thu 7 Mar 13

The council officers who were present when the pay award was first awarded would have been aware that there was a conflict of interest.The head of the legal Dept Dan Perkins was one of these officers as was the Chief exectutive Anthony O'Sullivan who was the author of the recommendation of these huge pay rises put before the council members.It is not acceptable that these allready highly paid officers
chose to remain in the meeting that was discussing their proposed pay rises. The question that we the rate payers of Caerphilly is "have we got confidence in any future decisions that these senior officers will be making when they got this compleatly wrong and its resulted correctly in a police investigation?.Furth
er it's alleged that a unnamed council member who was part of the committee that awarded the pay rise has stated that the officers of the council left the room when their pay was being discussed.This apparently did not happen if it is proved that the council member did lie then they surely the should be dismissed.

sharon1717 says...
10:32pm Thu 7 Mar 13

The reality is that whether the officers remained in the meeting with the councillors or not, it is unlikely the committee would have reached any other decision. The pay rise would still have been agreed, because that is the nature of the working relationship between councillors and executive officers. What remains most galling to me is that senior managers met with all staff and told them that everyone's pay would be frozen for at least 3 - 5 years, senior managers included, then barely two years later they negotiate a deal in secret for individual payrises that were more than the average salary of the staff working the manage! Total hypocrisy

Careful says...
12:03am Fri 8 Mar 13

Another prime example of the well worn rhetoric of late that "We're all in this together"! Out of touch arrogance if you ask me. I agree with the Editor in that senior officers should be held to be more accountable for poor decision making on matters of public interest. I also think that Councillors should challenge recommendations more and act in the (borough's) public interest in a transparent manner rather than playing political games on many levels. Only then will we as local taxpayers feel that local democracy is effective and represents good value for money.

J.D CAERPHILLY says...
9:16am Fri 8 Mar 13

We should all remember, considering Councillor Colin Mann Plaid Cymru leader of Caerphilly Council and Plaid Cymru Assembly Member and Caerphilly Councillor Lindsay Whittle`s call for this man to be removed because of his untenable position THAT IT WAS THEY WHO APPOINTED HIM TO DO THIS JOB IN THE FIRST PLACE.

What does this say about their judgment in local and Welsh National Politics????

Howie' says...
10:28am Fri 8 Mar 13

This according to 'Wales Online' this morning:

'The row over huge salary increases at Caerphilly council has taken another twist with the revelation that the authority paid £7,000 to management consultants and then failed to follow their advice'.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree