Bedroom tax will mean more homeless – Torfaen housing chief

SOME of Gwent’s most deprived areas are about to experience "severe poverty and almost certain homeless", with thousands having to move away from their homes.

That is the view of Bron Afon social housing chief executive Duncan Forbes, who said when the so-called bedroom tax comes into effect on April 1, many people will see their benefits drop down below the ‘surviving level".

He believes the move will affect 1,250 tenants from its network of 8,000 properties, with a demonstration project run by the Department for Works and Pensions showing how severe it will be.

In seven months from last July to January, those in Torfaen taking part in the trial saw their total arrears increase from £20,000 to £140,000.

The bedroom tax reform will see benefits paid directly to the claimant instead of the social landlord, as happens at the moment.

In an effort to get people housed in the right sized accommodation, people with spare bedrooms will see their level of benefit drop.

So, for example, if tenants get £78 per week benefit to cover their rent, that would drop to £67 if one bedroom is unoccupied and £60 if there are two unoccupied.

Mr Forbes said: "The rest would have to come from other income - which would make things impossible. In theory it is to encourage people to make choices to move to smaller accommodation, but there is nowhere else to put them.

"It is punitive and will take people below the surviving level, where some will go without meals and struggle to heat their homes. It will create real, real hardship."

He said if the Government wants people to move to smaller accommodation, social landlords should have the power to do so without penalising residents financially.

Mr Forbes cited the example of Blaenavon, where there are 86 people currently over-occupying and need to be re-housed in one-bedroom accommodation. However, only about five of these become available in the area every year, meaning it would theoretically take 17 years to re-house everyone.

He added: "It’s a bad idea all round and will create severe poverty and almost certain homelessness. If 1,300 people are moving in Torfaen over the next few years because of it, it will disrupt schools, healthcare, friendships and communities."

Comments(5)

NakedDancer says...
7:01pm Mon 11 Mar 13

In the current economic climate its essential that under-occupied houses are reallocated. However, it can't be fair to penalize people who are willing to downsize if there is no accommodation available for them to downsize to.

ChrisStrollers says...
8:49pm Mon 11 Mar 13

This isn't an exercise in reallocating under occupied houses or it could have been done in a different way, it's purely about the government saving money (which is not a bad thing) but instead of being honest & risking putting a nose or two out of joint they have dressed it up like this.

I wonder what would cause more outrage, a bill to make it easy for landlords to move tenants in under occupation or using enforced poverty to make people move/take in a lodger who turns out to be a murderer/rapist!?

Dai Rear says...
7:21am Tue 12 Mar 13

That is the view of Bron Afon social housing chief executive Duncan Forbes,
Paid to spout extreme left slogans. What a great job. But actually the only non-lie of the Failure 1997-2010 came when Liam Byrne said "there's no cash left"-no not even for handouts Mr. Forbes. "Bedroom Tax"? If the chattering classes can't understand the difference between a tax and a hand out they really are pathetic.

Trefor says...
9:16am Tue 12 Mar 13

Council`s, particularly, will find themselves in considerable trouble over this `bedroom charge`.

Over the years council`s have considered a two bed roomed house to be a three bed roomed house because it has a small box room, but, regardless of what the DWP say in the new "regulations", the Housing act, which no Government Minister or his civil servants can overrule, states that a house with a room of 70 Feet Square IS NOT A BEDROOM, but a store room.

When Councils and Housing Associations are calculating any of these obnoxious additional charges, they include these store rooms as bedrooms at their peril, any legal challenge by a tenant who finds themselves in such a situation would win and the Councilor the housing association would find themselves on the wrong side of the law.

Caerphilly Council have had a belly full of that in resent weeks so I hope they are being particularly circumspect. in the way they intend to apply these Tory charges on the least able to pay.

ghyc60 says...
12:02pm Tue 12 Mar 13

lets not forget it was Thatcher who sold off all the housing stock in the first place and why are we not protesting about the so called bedroon tax the same way we did about the poll tax because its the same thing under a different name.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree