‘Gipsy site responses must be considered’ - Newport councillor

‘Gipsy site responses must be considered’ - Newport councillor ‘Gipsy site responses must be considered’ - Newport councillor

THE 7,000 responses to a study on where to put Gipsy sites in Newport need to continue to be borne in mind in ongoing work on the issue, a councillor says.

Newport councillor Paul Hannon made the comment yesterday during a meeting of a council committee set to return to the matter once officers finish a technical assessment of 11 shortlisted sites.

Meanwhile, a councillor said she heard that her committee was going to reconsider the issue of gipsy sites from the Argus first before officers had informed her.

The Argus previously reported that cabinet has asked the scrutiny committee for community planning and development to assess ongoing officer work into 11 shortlisted Gipsy sites.

A group from the committee had already made its own recommendations to cabinet, but officers were asked to conduct a detailed site appraisal.

Yesterday the committee was asked to look at the list of topics for that appraisal, which were not disputed by the committee.

However, Labour councillor Hannon, for Beechwood, said: “One thing we benefited from was the huge response from the consultation exercise.”

He said that response should continue “to be a part of the appraisal process”.

The Gipsy site process was planned to feed so-called “focused changes” to the local development plan, to be dealt with by councillors this month.

But the council decided instead to put a revised LDP on deposit again, to be considered by councillors in June ahead of a sixweek consultation.

Cllr Hannon said that is going to be “an expensive process” and said he wasn’t sure its cost could be contained within existing budgets.

He added that the risks of going longer without having an LDP also needed to be considered.

Labour councillor Jane Mudd, for Malpas, said communication had been very poor and that she had read the Gipsy issue was coming back to the committee in the Argus first.

“It might be helpful to hear it first from officers, not the South Wales Argus,” she said.

The scrutiny committee previously identified the Road Safety Centre, near Hartridge Farm Road, to be allocated in the LDP as a preferred residential gipsy site, with Ringland Allotments and Brickyard Lane as contingencies.

Comments(8)

PaulHalliday says...
4:59pm Thu 14 Mar 13

It seems like even internally Labour are unable to manage the council. Maybe the council group just don't have the skills to manage a place like Newport.

Woodgnome says...
5:20pm Thu 14 Mar 13

The 7000 responses must be taken into account - there is no discretion about it. To do otherwise would make the consulation nothing but a cynical token gesture to shut the public up!!

Magor says...
5:23pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Why cant the council just accept that these sites are not wanted.There are more important matters in Newport.

Llanmartinangel says...
6:36pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Magor wrote:
Why cant the council just accept that these sites are not wanted.There are more important matters in Newport.
True but naive Sir. These travellers are non resident, non tax paying opportunists. Do you seriously think what we want registers at all?

Exile Elmo says...
9:12pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Llanmartinangel wrote:
Magor wrote:
Why cant the council just accept that these sites are not wanted.There are more important matters in Newport.
True but naive Sir. These travellers are non resident, non tax paying opportunists. Do you seriously think what we want registers at all?
Ironically if you only provide one site there will be carnage. The travelers are clan based and I've never heard of a fight between waring clans, have you?

I thought people wanted to encourage business entrepreneurs to the city..

Now that's irony...

Exile Elmo says...
9:15pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Brave photography by the way.

I can imagine someone in one of the caravans, looking out thinking "geeze.. dat bush has a camera"

amandadavies8 says...
9:24pm Thu 14 Mar 13

The site on Hartridge farm road, is such a bad idea...there is a infant and junior school there.....:(

Llanmartinangel says...
11:14pm Thu 14 Mar 13

amandadavies8 wrote:
The site on Hartridge farm road, is such a bad idea...there is a infant and junior school there.....:(
All 11 sites are a bad idea. They are all near decent people.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree