Blow to plans for displaying medieval ship in Newport (From South Wales Argus)
Get involved: Send your photos, video, news & views by texting ARGUS NEWS to 80360 or email
us
Blow to plans for displaying medieval ship in Newport
9:50am Tuesday 19th March 2013 in News
A NEW museum for Newport to reconstruct and display the popular medieval ship is not going to become a reality in the foreseeable future.
That’s according to a report obtained by the South Wales Argus that suggests the ship was not a priority after the 2012 council elections, despite estimates of 150,000 visitors a year if a museum was built.
Consultants group Colliers was commissioned by Newport council to find a site for a new city museum that would house the ship.
But after Labour was elected last May it was decided the study would not make a recommendation.
It instead suggested three possible options for storing the timbers – in Newport, in Nantgarw and in Portsmouth.
Newport council published a summary report that Colliers produced in June 2012 following an Argus Freedom of Information Act request, deleting a shortlist of potential museum sites because of commercial sensitivity.
But a diagram at the back of the report appears to show a possible location next to the Newport Footbridge on the Usk riverfront.
Work on the ship has been ongoing since it was found a decade ago. Freeze-drying of the Newport Ship timbers is currently under way at an industrial unit in Maesglas.
The report said that following the May elections the “administration has committed to a focus on education and the delivery of new schools.
“In light of this priority and lack of time and resources to apply to the museum project at present, it has been agreed that this study will not proceed to detailed feasibility at present,” it said.
“It is unknown at present when the museum project will command priority attention and resources from the council and so the delivery of a new facility to house and display the Newport Ship and associated artifacts is not going to be a reality in the short-medium term.”
Despite this, the consultants produced a shortlist of sites. Core requirements included that the museum is located on the Usk riverfront, close to or within walking distance of the new leisure developments and the Riverfront Theatre.
The report said as many as 150,000 visits could be made to a new museum every year.
It was recommended that the authority should consider a range of storage options for the ship’s timbers to protect the work done so far, with the lease on the Maesglas unit due to end in September 2014.
Colliers said it had understood that Newport was looking for a new storage site in the city, but facilities could be available at a National Museum Wales site in Nantgarw, and the Mary Rose Project in Portsmouth.
Council officers should make a further bid from the Heritage Lottery Fund for an interim project between now and the display of the ship, with funding due to end in 2014, the report added.
Disposal is not an option – council
TALKS are under way with the Welsh Government about the future of the ship and its storage, according to Newport council.
A spokeswoman confirmed that disposal was not being considered, despite a council report suggesting it as an option earlier this year.
She said Newport has always recognised the international significance of the ship, but the economic context that it is operating in is very different from when the ship was found more than ten years ago.
“Much of the information contained in the report would be relevant if the economic conditions become more favourable or if the council can attract a major delivery partner,” a spokeswoman said.
“The council is currently in discussions with Welsh Government about the future of the ship and the scope of these discussions will include storage and a funding strategy including the possibility of drawing in further Heritage Lottery Funding.”
A meeting was recently held between the Friends of the Newport Ship and the authority, where a copy of the report was shared.
Councillor Charles Ferris, patron of the Friends of the Newport Ship and who had been part of protests to save the ship after it was found, said he is staying optimistic.
“We have always understood that a project this size is just too big for a city to handle,” he said.
But he added: “It would be a terrible indictment if Newport can’t look after this unique find, which underlines Newport’s place in medieval history and as a trading centre.”
ARGUS COMMENT: Vision vital for city ship
WE HAVE said it before and we will say it again.
Newport’s medieval ship must remain in Newport and it must eventually be put on display.
Today we publish a report that has stayed secret until now that suggests the ship will never go on display.
Even worse, it suggests the ship’s timbers – currently being freeze-dried in a warehouse in the city – could end up being stored in Nantgarw or Portsmouth.
Regular readers will remember that when the ship was discovered during the building of the Riverfront Theatre it took a concerted campaign – backed by this newspaper – to persuade the council not to cover it with concrete.
Eleven years later it may take a similar community effort to persuade the council of the benefits of keeping the ship in Newport.
It is clear the council does not see a museum for the ship as being a priority.
We can understand such a view to an extent, particularly in these tough financial times for the public sector.
But Newport’s future cannot be built on short-termism.
There has to be some long-term vision, and displaying the ship, with all the potential tourism benefits that could bring, should be part of that vision.
The council should be seeking grants and private finance to ensure a jewel from Newport’s past becomes a centrepiece of its future.
Comments(19)
Owain Vaughan
says...
10:11am Tue 19 Mar 13
paddyparry
says...
11:26am Tue 19 Mar 13
Dee-Gee
says...
11:37am Tue 19 Mar 13
whatintheworld
says...
11:41am Tue 19 Mar 13
bound to get wider support than the free parking issue?
Jinxey
says...
11:54am Tue 19 Mar 13
Adrian Williams
says...
12:25pm Tue 19 Mar 13
PaulHalliday
says...
12:30pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Why not join our conversation on www.facebook.com/you
newport
FrannieB
says...
12:37pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Surely grant aided funding could be secured from somewhere so that the ship could be saved .
It would be a huge tourist attraction and bring much needed revenue to the town , for that is what it is .
No other council in the U.K would handle this opportunity in such an underhand , ignorant manner !
Owain Vaughan
says...
1:08pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Whatever happens the council will have made the wrong decision.
In this time of austerity I wouldn't want to be in their position.
Mr Bump.
says...
1:28pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Katie Re-Registered
says...
1:29pm Tue 19 Mar 13
whatintheworld
says...
1:54pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Owain Vaughan wrote:this comment has been flagged for being far too reasonable
This is classic damned-if-you-do and damned-if-you-don't argument that sums up any municipal body. Some people think spending millions on rotting timbers is a waste of money that could be spent on much-needed public services. Others think that investing money now will produce a international tourist attraction that can produce an ongoing revenue stream into the future. Whatever happens the council will have made the wrong decision. In this time of austerity I wouldn't want to be in their position.
broadsworddan
says...
2:15pm Tue 19 Mar 13
The Ship is very similar in its scope for tourism and newport council dont seem to have learnt their lesson.
Newport museum needs to relocate as I've heard the concrete structure is riddled with concrete cancer.
Surely the old sainsburys site would be a perfect location to amalgamate the ship and the museum. Plenty of parking, town centre location.
Don't let it be another huge mistake like the lyceum. Lets make the most of it.
swnpayne
says...
2:24pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Severn40
says...
5:30pm Tue 19 Mar 13
What should be done is to 'package' the ship with the transporter bridge, the Caerleon Roman site and Tredegar House. Suddenly all four charting different eras of history becomes an attractive proposition for visitors.
Unfortunately, I get the impression (on this news article alone but happy to be corrected) that the crude focus has been on a new building and the running costs. The totality and the wider impacts really need to be factored into the equation.
slice_of_life
says...
8:49pm Tue 19 Mar 13
http://www.southwale
sargus.co.uk/news/gw
entnews/10298928.Ton
y_Robinson_brings_hi
story_to_life_at_New
port_school/
JossexMaindee
says...
1:21am Wed 20 Mar 13
Gareth
says...
10:33am Wed 20 Mar 13
The Mary Rose project is a time capsule (think a maritime Pompeii) that utilises not only the ship timbers, but also thousands of artefacts that show exactly how the people lived, worked, ate, played...
It must also be noted that the Mary Rose sits alongside two other historic ships and the Royal Naval Museum, in a maritime harbour, in a maritime city that also benefits from huge incidental visitor numbers from the city's tradition as a major tourist trap.
In Newport we have timbers alone - no real story; no museum of artefacts; no definitive ship history; no details of those who served aboard.
Yes, the timbers are historically significant, but if they are backed up by nothing but artists' impressions and guesswork, then remain timbers, and not a museum that brings history to life.
There is also the lack of tradition of Newport as a tourist destination. We have a few things to offer, but so do every other town and city in the UK.
So if you are not an existing tourist destination, you will need a bottomless pit of a marketing budget. If neither applies, then, alas, all the hope in the world isn't going to get people through the door in huge numbers, nor regularly.
whatintheworld says...
10:08am Tue 19 Mar 13
Whatever happens I hope the boat stays in South Wales!