ARGUS COMMENT: Caerphilly council has to face facts

South Wales Argus: ARGUS COMMENT: Caerphilly council has to face facts ARGUS COMMENT: Caerphilly council has to face facts

THE REPORT IS printed in full and it is damning.

And it has been published specifically to draw the public's attention to a serious failure in governance arrangements at the heart of Caerphilly County Borough Council.

The auditor, appointed to look into the two issues of council decisions to 'buy out' chief officers entitlements to an essential car user allowance and their annual leave allowance, says he discovered a series of failings.

Highlighting that the areas of concern are significant he says he decided to publicise the report because the 'public needs to be aware of what has happened.'

That is entirely right.

The Wales Audit Office report concludes that actions taken by Caerphilly council in respect of the decisions under investigation were unlawful, which is of course the second time such a verdict has been reached in respect of this authority, in what has turned into a woeful saga.

For the council tax-payers of Caerphilly, the report makes for grim reading, highlighting as it does an informality of meetings and decisions, conflict of interest, lack of record keeping and the failure to follow advice and publish decisions.

Caerphilly council now has one month to respond to the auditor's report and to say what steps it is taking to ensure this never happens again.

However, a much more difficult task for the council may be in rebuilding public confidence among its residents.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:29pm Thu 19 Dec 13

Bobevans says...

It staggers me as to how these payments got approved and they claim not to know how or who approved them

Such a large amount would normally require in any company I have worked for at least three levels of approval and would have to be signed off by them. How can such large amounts be approved without any audit trail or signatures

No wonder local government is a mess
It staggers me as to how these payments got approved and they claim not to know how or who approved them Such a large amount would normally require in any company I have worked for at least three levels of approval and would have to be signed off by them. How can such large amounts be approved without any audit trail or signatures No wonder local government is a mess Bobevans

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree