Plans backed for ‘at risk’ 19th century Newport house

PLANS BACKED: Woodlands House in Malpas, Newport

PLANS BACKED: Woodlands House in Malpas, Newport

First published in News
Last updated

REVISED plans to partly demolish a 19th century gentry house on an at risk register will be discussed by councillors today.

Rydale Court Properties Ltd planned to turn the dilapidated, Grade II listed building Woodlands House off Woodlands Drive, Newport, into six flats and build seven houses within the grounds in 2012.

Councillors approved the plans but Newport council decided not to issue planning permission following concerns from heritage body Cadw and the local authority’s own historic buildings conservation officer.

Conservation group Save Britain’s Heritage had also threatened to take action by seeking a judicial review.

The proposals will be back on the table in the council chamber today though they have been significantly amended. It is still planned to partly demolish the building on the council’s at risk register and build seven properties around it.

But the council’s historic buildings conservation officer now believes the new proposals would result in “major enhancement” to the building. “It is clear that the majority of the original walls would be retained and that many rooms would retain their original proportions,” said the officer in a late submission.

“Most pleasingly, it is now proposed to retain the original grand entrance hallway and staircase and reunite these subdivided spaces so they will be seen as they were originally intended. Though there is still an absence of detail as to exactly what restoration work would be carried out, it seems clear that with the submission of appropriate detail, this scheme could now result in major enhancement to the historic character of the retained parts of the building.”

Newport planners have recommend the new plans be approved.

The planning report on Woodlands House states: “Whilst the conservation officer has some reservations about the scheme, it is noted that in the light of the further survey information, viability information and revisions to the plans, the conservation officer is much more supportive.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:05pm Wed 5 Mar 14

Mr Bump. says...

Pull the bloody thing down, it's an eyesore.
Pull the bloody thing down, it's an eyesore. Mr Bump.
  • Score: -8

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree