Bio-survey on Ebbw Vale racetrack site shows 'huge diversity'

First published in News by

A BIOLOGICAL survey of land in Rassau identified for the £315 million Circuit of Wales racetrack has revealed a huge diversity of wildlife, according to Gwent Wildlife Trust.

The so-called "bioblitz" on the area, carried out in late June by GWT staff, volunteers and specialist recorders from across Gwent, recorded more than 300 species including plants, butterflies, dragonflies and birds.

Gemma Bodé, GWT’s conservation manager, said: “We knew this area was very good for wildlife but the incredible range of species and rarities found has surprised us and the local recorders.”

The area of land proposed for the Circuit of Wales is a mixture of heathland, wet flushes, streams and acid grassland. Some of the rarer plants found included bog asphodel, bog pimpernel and marsh violet. Birds recorded included wheatears, skylarks, ring ousel and red grouse.

GWT said the area seemed "incredibly valuable" for dragonflies with 12 species recorded including the keeled skimmer , black darter and the UK’s largest, the golden-ringed dragonfly, making it a "key site" for dragonflies in Wales.

The environmental trust said it continues to campaign against the proposals for the Circuit of Wales, which celebrated the beginning of a ten-year association with the British MotoGP earlier this month.

GWT said the results of the bioblitz "confirmed our fears for the rich wildlife that would be permanently destroyed if the proposals were to go ahead. Detailed plans for how this loss of wildlife would be adequately mitigated for are still not evident."

Work on the racetrack, which hopes to bring up to 6,000 jobs, is scheduled to begin at the end of the year.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:42pm Wed 27 Aug 14

Good Job No Kids says...

How many species that wouldn't easily locate a mile or two away?

How many species that are protected?

Assumed to be none because surely this would be mentioned in the article. If this is the case their argument is pretty weak.
How many species that wouldn't easily locate a mile or two away? How many species that are protected? Assumed to be none because surely this would be mentioned in the article. If this is the case their argument is pretty weak. Good Job No Kids
  • Score: 1
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree