News RSS Feed


Anger at estate plan for village

9:15am Sunday 16th September 2007

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »


RESIDENTS are campaigning against a proposed development which they say would "completely change the way of life" in Llanwern.

At the moment, there are less than 100 houses in the village but developer Gallagher Estates wants to build 1,000 homes on a 90-acre site at Cots Hill, overlooking the area.

Members of an action group opposing the plan intend to put up placards in gardens and hold demonstrations.

Independent ward councillor Carole Atwell has joined the campaign.

"The villagers are very concerned and have set up an action group as this development on a green field site will transform their little village into a big estate and completely change the way of life," she said.

"To meet the housing requirements for the area, I hoped the local council would just develop a number of small villages into slightly bigger ones, not put all the new houses in one village.

"We are doing well in using brownfield sites, this should be pursued before greenfield land."

Various organisations have also joined the cause such as Friends of the Earth and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales which has suggested a new development could exacerbate flooding problems.

Resident Simon Brook said: "The countryside is being pushed further and further away in Newport and if this development goes ahead there will be no clear boundary between the countryside and town.

"This doesn't just degrade the immediate area but that beyond as well, making it hard to farm.

It doesn't register in planners' minds, but people in Newport would miss out."

The action group is planning to push for a flood risk assessment for the site.

A spokesman for Gallagher Estates said plans will go before Newport City Council within the next two months.

If the Gallagher scheme gets the go-ahead, it will include 1,000 homes, a new 420-place primary school, a village centre including shops and workplaces and a community meeting place.

Gallagher's managing director David Carden told the Argus last year he wanted to create a small modern community of which local people could be proud.


Your Say YourSouth Wales Argus

gwentman, newport, gwent says...
12:13pm Sun 16 Sep 07

NOT IN MY BACK YARD TYPICAL

tim, Magor says...
1:48pm Sun 16 Sep 07

There are hundreds of homes planned on the otherside of the railway on the old steelworks why do they need more in the village?

James, says...
4:20pm Sun 16 Sep 07

This plan has been available to read for years - why are they just starting to complain now?

Typical NIMBY attitude, Mr. Brook.

oatley, says...
8:04pm Sun 16 Sep 07

People who place NIMBY in their comments don't always understand the reason behind why people object to more housing developments, what is wrong with looking out of your window and seeing Countryside instead of seeing concrete jungles, which lets be fair is an eyesore.A village should remain a village and not have all these extra homes thrusted upon them. And who on earth are going to purchase these new builds all of the time, not locals.Where my family come from in Box, Wiltshire, I can still look at the same views that my Ancestors saw 200 or more years ago and the views are wonderful and will remain like that forever, because new developments are not allowed.Villagers fight it all the way and keep your village

Owain Vaughan, Newport Monmouthshire says...
9:13pm Sun 16 Sep 07

I'm sorry, but this is a typical "not my problem" scenario. If we don't build houses then locals will be forced out of the market anyway, so fighting against these plans may mean that the next generation miss out. These houses are clearly needed, and given the topology of the place can be made to blend in - just go and read the plans that have been available for ages !

Strongman, Newport says...
2:26pm Mon 17 Sep 07

Owain Vaughan wrote:
I'm sorry, but this is a typical "not my problem" scenario. If we don't build houses then locals will be forced out of the market anyway, so fighting against these plans may mean that the next generation miss out. These houses are clearly needed, and given the topology of the place can be made to blend in - just go and read the plans that have been available for ages !
Owain Vaughn, can you explain how 1,000 houses can be "made to blend in" in a village of 100 houses? Talk sense will you.

Strongman, Newport says...
3:11pm Mon 17 Sep 07

Owain Vaughan wrote:
I'm sorry, but this is a typical "not my problem" scenario. If we don't build houses then locals will be forced out of the market anyway, so fighting against these plans may mean that the next generation miss out. These houses are clearly needed, and given the topology of the place can be made to blend in - just go and read the plans that have been available for ages !
Owain Vaughn, can you explain how 1,000 houses can be "made to blend in" in a village of 100 houses? Talk sense will you.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »