A recipe for disaster

SAME-sex marriage has not yet been institutionalised in Great Britain, but it is on the cards courtesy of David Cameron, Westminster Government, and Alex Salmond, Scottish Government. The thinking in our liberal society these days to marriage comes from the dominant concept of love and human sexuality today which argues that you can’t choose who you are attracted to. This line of argument suggests, that whether chosen or not, this attraction, love, sentiment should always be consummated.

That is the dominant argument that governs modern understanding of sexuality. It says nothing about family; it says nothing about children but what it does provide is a licence for any form of sexual coupling that is consensual. This argument will give you an argument for same-sex marriage but it will also give you an argument for polyandrous marriage: multi-partner marriage and incestuous marriage. This current trend of thinking in which we find ourselves is a trajectory which is going to take us further and further in this direction.

As marriage is reduced at the end of the day simply to the satisfaction of sexual appetite, combined with liberal divorce laws, it is a recipe for disintegration, and disaster.

Norman Plaisted Vivian Road, Newport

Comments(6)

areyour4real says...
6:13pm Wed 9 Jan 13

This is the best letter in a while, really some of these nut jobs make me laugh out loud.

This bit, and I quote,

"This argument will give you an argument for same-sex marriage but it will also give you an argument for polyandrous marriage: multi-partner marriage and incestuous marriage. This current trend of thinking in which we find ourselves is a trajectory which is going to take us further and further in this direction."

Brilliant, and in ten years you will be able to be married to a pig, a horse, two women and a Greggs Pasty.

I tell you one thing, the Churches will make a fortune!

Let's all get married!

Mervyn James says...
6:17pm Wed 9 Jan 13

No it isn't, Cameron has stated the last word on same-sex marriage in church is outside their domain and it is up tot he church itself, not withstanding an major lobby of Tories are against it as well.. I don't think we are more liberal, certainly more uncertain about challenging these things with PC laws lined up against you if you comment. Looks more like enforcement regardless what you think. The above letter is just mumbo-jumbo and babble. I am not a religious follower, but totally respect those who are, and in their view same sex marriage is wrong, so, end of, it's their belief not mine. Plenty of civil marriage options... for those who want to make a mockery of the real thing.

Llanmartinangel says...
7:11pm Wed 9 Jan 13

I have to admit I don't really understand this. If no religious institution is forced to participate then where's the harm if they choose to do it? What you have to get your head around is one simple fact : it's not the people who love each other in this world that cause the problems, it's those who hate without good cause, or interfere in others lives when they are harming no-one.

Mervyn James says...
8:52am Thu 10 Jan 13

Love-hate two sides of the same coin. There are people here who hate welsh and certainly have no respect for that choice, once you start setting up a pecking order of rights, the whole thing collapses.

Marriage is basically a church concept based on a man and a woman and family ethos. For those that reject that concept and want same sex unions the option is there, but NOT in a church, which is fair enough. The gays cannot alter the rules to suit them in religious terms,the state hasn't the power to enforce it. It is dubious people are suggesting they should have that power, especially as the chaos of heirachial decision making, only targets ONE religion in the UK and none of the rest,it looks like bullying and totally unfair.

If Cameron and CO said OK we will force Islam, Hindu's, Buddhists, whatever, to comply as well, it might make more sense. As it stands it looks like deliberate bullying and playing on the British sense of 'fair play' which it certainly is NOT. British are scared stiff to oppose minority groups or religions as there is always some dubious rights lawyer prepared to sue them for a fat fee.

Llanmartinangel says...
6:35pm Thu 10 Jan 13

Mervyn James wrote:
Love-hate two sides of the same coin. There are people here who hate welsh and certainly have no respect for that choice, once you start setting up a pecking order of rights, the whole thing collapses.

Marriage is basically a church concept based on a man and a woman and family ethos. For those that reject that concept and want same sex unions the option is there, but NOT in a church, which is fair enough. The gays cannot alter the rules to suit them in religious terms,the state hasn't the power to enforce it. It is dubious people are suggesting they should have that power, especially as the chaos of heirachial decision making, only targets ONE religion in the UK and none of the rest,it looks like bullying and totally unfair.

If Cameron and CO said OK we will force Islam, Hindu's, Buddhists, whatever, to comply as well, it might make more sense. As it stands it looks like deliberate bullying and playing on the British sense of 'fair play' which it certainly is NOT. British are scared stiff to oppose minority groups or religions as there is always some dubious rights lawyer prepared to sue them for a fat fee.
I agree with a lot of that except that I've not seen anyone on here who 'hates Welsh'. There are people like me who think spending £2 Billion on it since 2002 only to see it decline to an even smaller minority in the latest census is obscene.

Mervyn James says...
7:46pm Sat 12 Jan 13

You cannot put a price on culture or identity, how much does English cost the UK ? Maybe a LOT more than £2B ? So long as it is alive we must support it, we cannot surely endorse cultural genocide, and certainly we wouldn't dare try on Bengali or something or Polish here...

Statistics look bad, they can say what you want them to say, but we only the other week read near 800,000 being spent by ONE LA area on basic translations, welsh is cheap at the price and least it is IN Wales and home grown. How about some stats to throw about how much the migrant uses of own languages etc cost us all ? or how much we pay to educate them in their own language,or how much we put up so they can follow their own ways ? welsh is a genuine bargain....

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree