Wheelie bin fun

SO GLAD to see that Torfaen council are encouraging tenants to get artistic and to personalise their wheelie bins. I dare say many people will create their own “masterpiece” along the lines of “Fight austerity, no cuts to services! No council tax increases!” Maybe a portrait of a favourite politician such as Iain Duncan Smith, David Cameron or Nick Clegg could adorn the bin with a suitable comment such as “Home sweet home “or “Total Banker”!(etc). I am sure the fun to be had will be enormous. It’s a great pity Torfaen council can’t supply the paint!

Terry Banfield Cardigan Crescent Cwmbran

Comments (16)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:48pm Thu 23 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

You could have Che Guevara on yours.
You could have Che Guevara on yours. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 2

1:35pm Fri 24 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that? GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: -5

2:51pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

GardenVarietyMushroo
m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
[quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 3

3:01pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo

m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 4

3:08pm Fri 24 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo

m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
Ah - irony - obviously too subtle for me.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]Ah - irony - obviously too subtle for me. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

3:09pm Fri 24 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo


m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.
Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.[/p][/quote]Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

3:57pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

GardenVarietyMushroo
m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo



m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.
Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.
Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it.
[quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.[/p][/quote]Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.[/p][/quote]Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 3

5:12pm Fri 24 Jan 14

varteg1 says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
You could have Che Guevara on yours.
I would prefer those mentioned by Banfield were in mine, for collection and disposal via the usual route, as voting them out seems impossible.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: You could have Che Guevara on yours.[/p][/quote]I would prefer those mentioned by Banfield were in mine, for collection and disposal via the usual route, as voting them out seems impossible. varteg1
  • Score: -4

9:37am Sun 26 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo

m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo




m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.
Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.
Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it.
Fair comment on the first part of your reply - try as I might I just can't think of a rejoinder.

As for the second - I'm really not surprised, though I am disappointed, that you once again seem to resort to unfounded character assassination. I don't know Mr. B myself (though as we both appear to have similar opinions on many issues, I certainly wouldn't be averse to meeting the man (or woman) for a coffee and a chat) - but personally speaking, I would hold off on making any accusations that I couldn't actually prove, or back up with evidence.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.[/p][/quote]Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.[/p][/quote]Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it.[/p][/quote]Fair comment on the first part of your reply - try as I might I just can't think of a rejoinder. As for the second - I'm really not surprised, though I am disappointed, that you once again seem to resort to unfounded character assassination. I don't know Mr. B myself (though as we both appear to have similar opinions on many issues, I certainly wouldn't be averse to meeting the man (or woman) for a coffee and a chat) - but personally speaking, I would hold off on making any accusations that I couldn't actually prove, or back up with evidence. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

10:55am Sun 26 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

GardenVarietyMushroo
m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo


m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo





m
wrote:
I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?
I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.
IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.
Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.
Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it.
Fair comment on the first part of your reply - try as I might I just can't think of a rejoinder.

As for the second - I'm really not surprised, though I am disappointed, that you once again seem to resort to unfounded character assassination. I don't know Mr. B myself (though as we both appear to have similar opinions on many issues, I certainly wouldn't be averse to meeting the man (or woman) for a coffee and a chat) - but personally speaking, I would hold off on making any accusations that I couldn't actually prove, or back up with evidence.
It wasn't an 'accusation', hence use of the word 'seems'. It wasn't character assassination either really. The evidence of his weekly meanderings are there for all to see, so call it a theory along the lines of 'why couch such letters in such brash pejorative prose when the target of your angst is a small town council and your audience an even smaller provincial newspaper'. Forgive me but you're not above playful banter aimed at the same old aunt Sallys yourself, as the post you filed on the drug-dealing boxer indicates.
[quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: I know you just can't help yourself, and that you just have to criticise Mr. B - but surely you could have done better than that?[/p][/quote]I can see irony isn't your strong point. I chose a predictable caricature simply because he chose ISS. His letter is a cheap shot, I fired back in kind.[/p][/quote]IDS should have read. You are right though, I can't help myself where this one is concerned. In the interests of balance however, perhaps I should congratulate Mr B on his first letter in many months which didn't contain the phrase 'ideologically led con/dem government'. Is being 'ideologically led' a disqualifier for someone in politics one wonders.[/p][/quote]Depends - reckon I'd take practicality and reason over ideology any day.[/p][/quote]Ideology (noun). a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Like me, you've not been without thoughts which fit that definition so perhaps decrying ideology is the wrong tack. In any event Mr B seems to be an ideological armchair warrior whose contribution to the glorious struggle involves writing a weekly missive to the SW Argus about one of the least significant councils in creation. Hardly the stuff of the blo*dy martyrs is it.[/p][/quote]Fair comment on the first part of your reply - try as I might I just can't think of a rejoinder. As for the second - I'm really not surprised, though I am disappointed, that you once again seem to resort to unfounded character assassination. I don't know Mr. B myself (though as we both appear to have similar opinions on many issues, I certainly wouldn't be averse to meeting the man (or woman) for a coffee and a chat) - but personally speaking, I would hold off on making any accusations that I couldn't actually prove, or back up with evidence.[/p][/quote]It wasn't an 'accusation', hence use of the word 'seems'. It wasn't character assassination either really. The evidence of his weekly meanderings are there for all to see, so call it a theory along the lines of 'why couch such letters in such brash pejorative prose when the target of your angst is a small town council and your audience an even smaller provincial newspaper'. Forgive me but you're not above playful banter aimed at the same old aunt Sallys yourself, as the post you filed on the drug-dealing boxer indicates. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 1

11:24am Sun 26 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...)

Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.
Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...) Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with? There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

11:30am Sun 26 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

GardenVarietyMushroo
m
wrote:
Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...)

Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.
'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)'

As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.
[quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...) Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with? There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.[/p][/quote]'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)' As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 1

11:43am Sun 26 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo

m
wrote:
Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...)

Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.
'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)'

As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.
My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...) Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with? There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.[/p][/quote]'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)' As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.[/p][/quote]My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

12:12pm Sun 26 Jan 14

Llanmartinangel says...

GardenVarietyMushroo
m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo


m
wrote:
Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...)

Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.
'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)'

As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.
My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect.
Wasn't it you who said 'even a stopped clock is right twice a day' about David Davies? Well there ya go.
[quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...) Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with? There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.[/p][/quote]'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)' As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.[/p][/quote]My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect.[/p][/quote]Wasn't it you who said 'even a stopped clock is right twice a day' about David Davies? Well there ya go. Llanmartinangel
  • Score: 0

1:07pm Sun 26 Jan 14

GardenVarietyMushroom says...

Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo

m
wrote:
Llanmartinangel wrote:
GardenVarietyMushroo



m
wrote:
Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...)

Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.
'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)'

As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.
My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect.
Wasn't it you who said 'even a stopped clock is right twice a day' about David Davies? Well there ya go.
So let me see if I have this straight - when Mr. Banfield comments on the workings of a 'small town council' to the readers of 'an even smaller provincial newspaper' and you agree with him, then that;s fine. When you don't agree with him, that ceases to be fine and becomes instead grounds for dismissal?

There's a word for that - hypocrisy.
[quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Llanmartinangel[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]GardenVarietyMushroo m[/bold] wrote: Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever...) Seems to me that it's just an excuse to denigrate something you can't otherwise find fault with? There's absolutely nothing wrong with voicing opinion on local matters. Not every objection needs weighty subjects for validation.[/p][/quote]'Didn't hear you making such complaints when the subject was lollipop ladies (men?people? whatever…)' As I recall, my comment on that one was along the lines of 'seems an odd thing to consider axing when spending money on a Welsh language website'. So no, I didn't complain.[/p][/quote]My recollection was along the lines of 'much as I hate to agree with Mr. Banfield, I find I do' - or words to that effect.[/p][/quote]Wasn't it you who said 'even a stopped clock is right twice a day' about David Davies? Well there ya go.[/p][/quote]So let me see if I have this straight - when Mr. Banfield comments on the workings of a 'small town council' to the readers of 'an even smaller provincial newspaper' and you agree with him, then that;s fine. When you don't agree with him, that ceases to be fine and becomes instead grounds for dismissal? There's a word for that - hypocrisy. GardenVarietyMushroom
  • Score: 0

10:42am Sun 2 Feb 14

IheartGeneHunt says...

I shall paint mine in rubberised paint so that they can bounce when the refuse collectors throw them back on the pavement. My recycle box is already broken because of this and I'll be damned if I will pay for a new one just because a "technician" can't be ar**d to take a bit of care!
I shall paint mine in rubberised paint so that they can bounce when the refuse collectors throw them back on the pavement. My recycle box is already broken because of this and I'll be damned if I will pay for a new one just because a "technician" can't be ar**d to take a bit of care! IheartGeneHunt
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree