Science limits

WELL said, Mr Plaisted! I’ll wager that the scientist referred to is the one who states that the first self-replicating molecule, the key to the creation of life, came about by “accident”.

The medical scientist Professor Stephen Palmer writes: “Unfortunately, most lay people are beguiled by the aura of science into thinking that scientific textbooks are the last word in truth. But they may contain just as many errors and limitations as the people who write them, and they will consistently propound dogma which upholds the self-esteem of science.”

A reading of the early chapters of 1st Corinthians shows that the wisdom of men and the wisdom of God are irreconcilable. Men may speak while God will act, and it is the actions of God, past, present, and future, which will be the deciding factor, not the conjectural words of men.

Tom McCarthy Gaer Park Parade Newport

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:10am Thu 1 May 14

exMark says...

Take the blinkers off mate. God is a lie. The bible is a lie. You are a lie.

Amen
Take the blinkers off mate. God is a lie. The bible is a lie. You are a lie. Amen exMark
  • Score: 6

10:32am Thu 1 May 14

coalpicker says...

exMark wrote:
Take the blinkers off mate. God is a lie. The bible is a lie. You are a lie.

Amen
Sorry to disagree, a political confidence trick put together by ancient people resembling Blair preying on fear and superstition .
[quote][p][bold]exMark[/bold] wrote: Take the blinkers off mate. God is a lie. The bible is a lie. You are a lie. Amen[/p][/quote]Sorry to disagree, a political confidence trick put together by ancient people resembling Blair preying on fear and superstition . coalpicker
  • Score: 2

10:58am Thu 1 May 14

Jimport says...

Yes, science is fallible because it is a human conception, and humans are fallible because they are real. Your conception of God, on the other hand, is infallible because it is not real.
Yes, science is fallible because it is a human conception, and humans are fallible because they are real. Your conception of God, on the other hand, is infallible because it is not real. Jimport
  • Score: 4

11:17am Thu 1 May 14

varteg1 says...

First Mr McCarthy you must use some high degree of empirical evidence that this god you bang on about actually exists outside of the minds of the deluded who constantly refer to it as though it is a touchable, visible, smellable, or hear-able entity, going to church and devouring a sliver of communion bread, or taking a sip of Christ's blood in the form of a wine in the belief it is taste-able, hardly comes near to verifiable evidence.

But you are free to carry on in your fantasy, just don't smear it over the only religion free free pages of a commercial publication by writing in letters that seek to push your incredible doctrinaire ism. it does not resonate with most, if anything it simply annoys.
First Mr McCarthy you must use some high degree of empirical evidence that this god you bang on about actually exists outside of the minds of the deluded who constantly refer to it as though it is a touchable, visible, smellable, or hear-able entity, going to church and devouring a sliver of communion bread, or taking a sip of Christ's blood in the form of a wine in the belief it is taste-able, hardly comes near to verifiable evidence. But you are free to carry on in your fantasy, just don't smear it over the only religion free free pages of a commercial publication by writing in letters that seek to push your incredible doctrinaire ism. it does not resonate with most, if anything it simply annoys. varteg1
  • Score: 2

12:18pm Thu 1 May 14

Walter Devereux says...

So how did life come about then? Which of the two contradictory accounts in Genesis is right? Genesis 1:25-27, where Humans were created after the other animals and man and woman were created at the same time, or Genesis 2:18-22 where Humans were created before the other animals and the woman out of a Man's rib? Which part of this infallible word of the creator is actually right? What's that? Neither?
So how did life come about then? Which of the two contradictory accounts in Genesis is right? Genesis 1:25-27, where Humans were created after the other animals and man and woman were created at the same time, or Genesis 2:18-22 where Humans were created before the other animals and the woman out of a Man's rib? Which part of this infallible word of the creator is actually right? What's that? Neither? Walter Devereux
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree