New is not always safe (From South Wales Argus)
Get involved: Send your photos, video, news & views by texting ARGUS NEWS to 80360 or email
us
New is not always safe
5:08pm Wednesday 17th October 2012 in Letters
PART of Newport council’s argument for forcing taxi firms to have new cabs was the aspect of ensuring the roadworthiness of vehicles.
However, just to show having a brand new vehicle doesn’t necessarily mean a safe vehicle. Manganese Bronze, maker of the London cab, has suspended sales of its taxis and recalled 400 which have suffered from a defective steering box.
D Fothergill, St Julians Avenue, Newport
Comments(12)
smokintheweed
says...
1:52am Thu 18 Oct 12
If you are so anti-China why don't you throw away all of your Chinese goods.
As for British engineering have a look for company called British Leyland. It is rather sad that this country's engineering sector has been slowed down but other countries can produce the goods cheaper and in the case of most appliances, better.
drawing comparison to a the Chinese and monkeys is also rather prejudiced of you. Twerp.
gathin
says...
6:47am Thu 18 Oct 12
Oh, that's right it is a big, badly run town- sorry!
Mudwolf
says...
3:51pm Thu 18 Oct 12
smokintheweed
says...
1:02am Fri 19 Oct 12
To suggest they are less safe is a strange concept to me too. I may be wrong on this but every vehicle has to pass a road worthiness test regularly to be considered safe on a public highway. Also, most cars are made by manufacturers that are well renowned for reliability and safety.
The only thing that can go wrong are other road users or the piece of meat behind the steering wheel.
Mudwolf
says...
10:16am Fri 19 Oct 12
taxi imformation
says...
8:21pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Mudwolf wrote:Thats why taxi,s are tested twice a year by the council plus their standard mot,and didn,t the cavalier go out of production in 1995 which would make it at least 17 years old.
Not at all Weed, sure it doesn't have to be Mercs, that wass just an example from a "poor country" in economic distress such as Newport is. While a yearly MOT test is good for your average car doing say 12,000 miles per year of mixed motoring, taxis can be covering easily 50,000 miles in the same period and predominently urban mileage with potholes and speed bumps. Some of the cars I have been in recently were certainly close to re-plating time judging by the peculiar noises coming from the suspension. I know one taxi driver who recently bought a Cavalier that was already over 10 years old with a new MOT to run for a year without any maintenance, six hundred pounds doesn't get much of a car. As for safety take a look at EuroNCAP ratings, you may learn something, or do you think that there are no safety improvements made to newer models of cars along with cleaner emmisions.
smokintheweed
says...
12:51am Sat 20 Oct 12
Mudwolf
says...
3:29am Sat 20 Oct 12
taxi imformation wrote:That just makes the situation even worse surely.
Mudwolf wrote: Not at all Weed, sure it doesn't have to be Mercs, that wass just an example from a "poor country" in economic distress such as Newport is. While a yearly MOT test is good for your average car doing say 12,000 miles per year of mixed motoring, taxis can be covering easily 50,000 miles in the same period and predominently urban mileage with potholes and speed bumps. Some of the cars I have been in recently were certainly close to re-plating time judging by the peculiar noises coming from the suspension. I know one taxi driver who recently bought a Cavalier that was already over 10 years old with a new MOT to run for a year without any maintenance, six hundred pounds doesn't get much of a car. As for safety take a look at EuroNCAP ratings, you may learn something, or do you think that there are no safety improvements made to newer models of cars along with cleaner emmisions.Thats why taxi,s are tested twice a year by the council plus their standard mot,and didn,t the cavalier go out of production in 1995 which would make it at least 17 years old.
smokintheweed
says...
3:20am Sun 21 Oct 12
Mudwolf wrote:Perhaps I have read this wrong. It would seem that taxi's are subject to greater MOT scrutiny than a regular car.
smokintheweed wrote:Idiot.
Burn!
Burn!!!
smokintheweed
says...
1:33pm Sun 21 Oct 12
As for your comments on appearance and emissions I didn't question that so I have no idea why you are trying to bring that up in an attempt to win a futile argument on the internet. I was talking about taxis that were arguably more mechanically fit to be on the road than most other cars of a similar age.
smokintheweed
says...
1:02am Wed 24 Oct 12
Riley2012 says...
9:48pm Wed 17 Oct 12