THE leader of Newport council’s Liberal Democrat group has resigned from the authority’s planning committee, claiming it is “increasingly toothless”.

Cllr Carmel Townsend has voiced frustration over the amount of decisions being made after planning appeals to the Welsh Government and says city councillors have an increasing lack of influence.

The council says it is satisfied decisions made by the committee are "robust, reasonable and in accordance with the regulations".

Cllr Townsend resigned from her position on Newport council’s planning committee on Monday with immediate effect.

“The committee is increasingly toothless, with councillor input of limited value,” she said.

“So many decisions get appealed back to Welsh Government, and they are almost always upheld by people who don’t understand the negative impact on the ground.

“In my area, and elsewhere across Newport, people’s quality of life is being damaged by almost a developer free-for-all. This impacts parking, general amenity, and litter and rubbish.”

READ MORE:

Cllr Townsend, who represents the St Julians ward, has been a member of the committee since 2017.

But she says the city needs “a new strategic direction, rather than a leadership that appears to be frightened of appeals and Welsh Government planning inspectors”.

“I am resigning so that I can be completely free to stand up for residents who deserve far better, and be critical of the decisions being made,” Cllr Townsend added.

Conservative councillor Charles Ferris, who is also on the committee, said he shared some of the frustrations voiced by councillor Townsend.

“I do not think it’s a fault of Newport council or the planning committee,” he said.

“But it is the fact that we seem to be tied by diktats of the appeal process and the inspector seems to cast in stone what will be accepted.

“It goes against in many ways the influence of the planning committee.”

Cllr Ferris said there has been particular frustration over applications regarding houses in multiple occupation which have been recommended for approval despite parking concerns.

Despite being against an application, Cllr Ferris said the committee can be reluctant to reject plans if the decision is likely to be overturned after an appeal.

“If we vote against it goes to the inspector, who can award costs against the council,” Cllr Ferris said.

A council spokesman said the planning committee is formed by members of all political parties with representation on the council, and is required to consider each individual application on its merits. 

"Members are provided with a recommendation from officers but are not obliged to agree with it, providing there are sound planning reasons for reaching an alternative decision," he said.

"The views of the committee are an important part of the process and members are able to influence and challenge outcomes using their knowledge and experience. 

"Decisions themselves are subject to challenge and committee members receive regular training and updates on appeal decisions in order to ensure that they are fully informed of important issues and decisions. 

"The committee operates in an open and transparent way with full and detailed reports provided for each agenda item. Public speakers are also given the opportunity to address the committee before the decision is voted on and a decision made by a majority outcome. All meetings are broadcast live on the web for the public and interested parties to view. 

"The council is satisfied that decisions made by the committee are robust, reasonable and in accordance with the regulations."