Councillors' concerns over Sudbrook housing plan

First published in News

TWO Monmouthshire councillors raised concerns about access for the emergency services should Sudbrook have a new housing development.

Outline planning permission was granted for 46 homes at the Old Shipyard, at the end of Sudbrook Road, which is the first stage of getting the scheme underway.

Local member and Monmouthshire council leader Cllr Peter Fox spoke out against St Maurs Estate Ltd's plans at Tuesday's meeting, suggesting there would be "significant issues" managing the construction work on roads in the "narrowest part of the village."

"That village is steeped in history, it started to be built in 1873, the tunnel opened in 1886 and it's a cultural jewel in the crown to us so we have to look after it," he added.

Cllr Pauline Watts said there were lots of factors against the plans.

"Should there be a fire or a big accident you wouldn't get an ambulance to it," she said.

The council's head of planning, George Ashworth, told members of the committee the site is "highly unusual" because it has not been developed since being identified for housing in 1993.

Heidi Davies, the applicant's agent, said the number of homes proposed was reduced from 49 to 46.

She told the meeting there is ample room for two vehicles to pass each other safely on Sudbrook Road.

A planning report said there would be 239 daily trips generated by the new estate but there were no highway grounds to sustain an objection.

This was against the views of many residents, who said the access road is unsuitable for additional traffic as it is narrow, congested and constrained by on-street parking.

Outline planning permission was granted by seven votes to six.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:44am Sat 8 Sep 12

karlgreenf says...

So - despite erudite, well-reasoned aind justified heartfelt objections from almost EVERY resident to this insane plan - permission is granted?. The villagers will not sit in their foundation-less homes for the vibrations of the passing concrete lorries to wreck them. Won't quietly breathe the contamination (asbestos etc.) of that land as it is made airbourne by the developer. Won't "sadly regret" the collateral damageto their children in the form of the obvious riseof "regrettable road accidents" that have been warned against and ignored. The planning site is full of hundreds of reasons why these houses must not be built. Prepare for war!.
So - despite erudite, well-reasoned aind justified heartfelt objections from almost EVERY resident to this insane plan - permission is granted?. The villagers will not sit in their foundation-less homes for the vibrations of the passing concrete lorries to wreck them. Won't quietly breathe the contamination (asbestos etc.) of that land as it is made airbourne by the developer. Won't "sadly regret" the collateral damageto their children in the form of the obvious riseof "regrettable road accidents" that have been warned against and ignored. The planning site is full of hundreds of reasons why these houses must not be built. Prepare for war!. karlgreenf
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree